The Raafidis=Shi’a are undoubtedly kuffaar=non-Muslims=Out of the fold of Islam for these Reasons

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐚𝐚𝐟𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐬=𝐒𝐡𝐢’𝐚 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐭𝐞𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐤𝐮𝐟𝐟𝐚𝐚𝐫=𝐧𝐨𝐧-𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬=𝐎𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐬

Mohamad Mostafa Nassar

Twitter@NassarMohamadMR

This is why Shia are NOT Muslims, simply because they do NOT follow the Authentic teachins of Islam and INVENTED their own Corrupted ways

Example of What the Shia are doing in Iran

You can not ask even the Prophet in his Grave for forgiveness or for his intercession:

Starting this topic with the following glorious Quranic verses (3:128-129) is enough to refute anyone who claim that it is permissible to go to the grave of the Prophet peace be upon him and ask for forgiveness and his intercession on judgment day.

However, we will elaborate trying to refute every angle of the allegations after these sharing these glorious Quranic verses (3:128-129).

1) They cast aspersions on the Qur’an, claiming that two-thirds of it has been omitted, as is stated in their book by al-Noori which is called Fasl al-Khitaab fi Ithbaat Tahreef Kitaab Rabb al-Arbaab, and in Al-Kaafi, and other books.

Whoever casts aspersions on the Qur’an is a kaafirs=out of the fold of Islam who disbelieves in the words of Allah (interpretation of the meaning): “and surely, we will guard it (from corruption)” [al-Hijr 15:9]

2) They cast aspersions upon the Sunnah and the sahih=Authentic ahadith=Statements. They do not follow them, because they were narrated from the Sahabah=Companions of the Prophet who, according to them, are kuffaar=non-Muslims. They believe that the Sahabah=Companions of the prophet became kaafirs after the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) died, apart from ‘Ali and his

descendants, Salmaan, ‘Ammaar and a few others. But regarding the first three khaleefahs=successors of the Prophet and the majority of the Sahabah=Companions of the Prophet who gave their bay’ah (oath of allegiance) to them, they think that they all apostatized and became kaafirs, so their ahadith=statements cannot be accepted. This is stated in al-Kaafi and other books of theirs.

3) They regard the Sunnis (Ahl al-Sunnah) as kaafirs, so they do not pray with you. Whoever prays behind a Sunni will repeat his prayer. Indeed, they think that we are naajis (impure), and when they shake hands with us they go and wash their hands. Whoever regards the Muslims as kaafirs is himself a kaafirs=non-Muslim, so we regard them as kaafirs just as they regard us as kaafirs, and more so.

4)They commit clear shirk in their exaggerations about ‘Ali and his descendants and in their calling upon them alongside Allah. This is stated clearly in their books, where they exaggerate about them and describe them in terms that are befitting only for the Lord of the Worlds. We have heard this in their tapes.

They do not participate in the charity work of the Ahl al-Sunnah or give charity to the Sunni poor; if they do these things, it is with deeply rooted and hidden hatred, and they do that as a form of taqiyya (dissimulation, calculated deception).

On these grounds, anyone who has given zakat=almsgiving to them must pay his zakat=almsgiving again, because he has given it to someone who will be helped in his kufr and to wage war against the Sunnah thereby.

Whoever is obliged to pay zakat=almsgiving is forbidden to give it to a Raafidi=Shi’a; if he does this, he has not discharged his obligation and he has to pay it again because he did not give the money with which he had been entrusted to the people who were entitled to receive it.

Whoever doubts this, let him read the books that have been written in refutation of them, such as the book by al-Qifaari which refutes their way, and al-Khutoot al-‘Areedah by al-Khateeb, and the books of Ehsan Ilahi Zaheer, and others. And Allah is the Source of Strength.

[Note: al-Khutoot al’Areedah and the books of Ehsan Ilahi Zaheer are available in English Translation. – Translator]–

Similarities Between Christianity and Shiasm

𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐒𝐡𝐢’𝐚 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐤 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐚𝐝 𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦.

Deviant Shia are NOT Muslims, and their deviancy has been bringing bad name to Islam.

Islam strictly prohibit Sodomy/homosexuality with severe death penalty for both people who are found to be committing that major sin as prescribed under Islamic Shariah laws

Now we find that Shia Mushrik=Polytheist grave worshipper saying, if two males are found committing Sodomy/homosexuality while fasting, the fasting is still ok and not broken.

We Muslims have been saying for centuries that Shi’a are NOT Muslims and have warned endlessly about their deviations and Polytheism.

They are the enemy within as they claim to be Muslims, and non-Muslims getting bad perception about Islam because of those Shia Mushrik polytheistic grave worshippers.

𝐓𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐝- 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐧𝐮𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐲 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦.

Question

Is there scholarly consensus on all ten things which nullify Islam that were mentioned by Imam Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahab?

Answer

Praise be to Allah.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐧𝐮𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐲 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐞𝐧:

They were mentioned by Imam Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahab, and there is scholarly consensus on all of them except one, namely Sihr (magic, witchcraft), which is subject to further discussion, but regarding some forms of it, the scholars are unanimously agreed that it nullifies Islam, as we shall see below

𝐖𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐬𝐮𝐦 𝐮𝐩 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐧𝐮𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐲 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦 𝐚𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐬:

1. Shirk = Polytheism or Associating others in worship with Allah, may He be exalted

Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Verily, Allah forgives not that partners should be set up with him in worship, but He forgives except that (anything else) to whom He pleases.”

Quran [an-Nisa’ 4:48]

“Verily, whosoever sets up partners in worship with Allah, then Allah has forbidden Paradise for him, and the Fire will be his abode. And for the Zalimoon (polytheists and wrongdoers) there are no helpers”

Quran[al-Ma’idah 5:72].

That includes calling upon the dead, seeking their help, and making vows and offering sacrifices to them.

The evidence for this in the Qur’an and Sunnah is more than can be listed, and the scholarly consensus on this point is well established.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The basis of shirk (ascription of partners to Allah) is when you equate Allah, may He be exalted, with His creation in terms of some of that which He alone deserves to have ascribed to Him, because no one ever equated anything to Allah in all respects. So, whoever worships anything other than Him, or puts his trust in that thing is a mushrik who has associated something else with Him.

End quote from al-Istiqaamah (1/344)

Ibn ‘Abd al-Haadi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

If a person comes to the bier of a dead person, calling upon him instead of Allah and seeking his help, this is Shirk=polytheism and is haram=forbidden according to Muslim consensus.

End quote from as-Saarim al-Munki (p. 436)

2. Ascribing intermediaries to Allah

Whoever makes intermediaries between him and Allah, calls upon them, asks them to intercede for him and puts his trust in them, is a disbeliever according to scholarly consensus.

The evidence for that is the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And they worship besides Allah things that hurt them not, nor profit them, and they say: ‘These are our intercessors with Allah.’ Say: ‘Do you inform Allah of that which He knows not in the heavens and on the earth?’ Glorified and Exalted be He above all that which they associate as partners with Him!”

[Chapter Younus Qur’an 10:18].

Whoever does that is akin to those who worship idols.

Hence Ibn Muflih (may Allah have mercy on him) said in al-Furoo‘(3/553):

Because that is like the deeds of idol worshippers who say: We only worship them so that they may bring us closer to Allah. End quote.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

Whoever makes the angels and Prophets intermediaries, calling upon them, putting his trust in them, asking them to bring benefits and ward off harm – such as asking them for forgiveness of sins, guidance, relief of distress and meeting of needs – is a disbeliever according to Muslim consensus.

End quote from Majmoo‘ al-Fatāwá (1/124)

The scholars learned about this consensus from Shaykh al-Islam, and confirmed it in their books, in the chapters on the rulings on apostates, as was quoted by al-Mirdaawi in al-Insaaf (10/327), where he says:

The same ruling applies if he makes intermediaries between himself and Allah, putting his trust in them, calling upon them and asking of them. That is according to scholarly consensus. End quote.

See: Kashshaaf al-Qinaa‘by al-Bahooti (6/168); al-Furoo‘ by Ibn Muflih (3/553)

3. Not regarding the Mushrikin=Polythiests as kuffar (disbelievers)

Whoever does not regard the Mushrikin as kuffaar (disbelievers) and doubts whether they are disbelievers, or regards their beliefs are sound, is himself a disbeliever.

Regarding this nullifier of Islam, there is scholarly consensus that the one who does this is a disbeliever. What is meant by the “Mushrikin” here is one who was originally a disbeliever. Connected to them are those who commit an act of

apostasy on which the scholars are unanimously agreed that it is definitely apostasy, with regard to an issue that is well-known to be a fundamental part of the religion, such as one who denies the resurrection, or who rejects a verse of the Book of Allah, and other clear causes of apostasy concerning which there is no ambiguity.

Al-Qaadi ‘Iyaad (may Allah have mercy on him) narrated that there was scholarly consensus on this matter, and he said:

There is consensus that one who does not regard any of the Jews and Christians as disbelievers or does not regard anyone who leaves the religion of the Muslims as a disbeliever or does not take a stand with regard to this issue, or is unsure about it, is himself a disbeliever.

End quote from ash-Shifa’ (2/281)

4. Believing that the guidance of someone other than Prophet Muhammed (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is more perfect than his guidance, etc.

Whoever believes that the guidance of someone other than the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is more perfect than his guidance, or that the rule of someone other than him is better than his rule, such as those who prefer the rule of man-made laws over the Prophet’s rulings, is a kaafir (disbeliever).

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

This category includes those who believe that the systems and laws invented by people are superior to the Shari’ah of Islam, or that they are equal to it, or that it is permissible to refer to them for judgement, even if they believe that

judging according to Shari’ah is preferable; and those who believe that the Islamic system is not fit to be applied in the twentieth century, or that it was a cause of the Muslims’ decline, or that it should be limited to a person’s relationship with his Lord and should have nothing to do with other matters of life.

That also includes those who think that implementing the rulings of Allah with regard to cutting off the hand of the thief or stoning the previously married adulterer is not appropriate in the present age. And it also includes everyone

who believes that it is permissible to rule by something other than the laws of Allah in the case of transactions, hudood punishments, and other matters, even if they do not believe that that is preferable to the ruling of Shari’ah, because by

doing that they are regarding as permissible that which Allah has prohibited, according to scholarly consensus, and whoever regards as permissible that which Allah has prohibited, and that is one of the well-known fundamental

teachings of the religion – such as Zina=adultery, alcohol, Riba= the forbidden interest credited from loans or deposits and ruling by something other than the laws of Allah – is a disbeliever according to Muslim consensus.

End quote from Majmoo‘ Fatāwá ash-Shaykh Ibn Baaz (1/132)

There is scholarly consensus regarding this nullifier of Islam.

5. Hating something that was brought by Prophet Muhammed (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)

Whoever hates something that was brought by the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), even if he complies with it, is a disbeliever, because Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“That is because they hate that which Allah has sent down (this Quran and Islamic laws, etc.), so He has made their deeds fruitless.”

Quran [Muhammad 47:9].

There is scholarly consensus that the one who hates that which was brought by the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is a disbeliever, as was stated by al-Bahooti in Kashshaaf al-Qinaa‘(6/168).

6. Ridiculing any aspect of the religion of Prophet Muhammed (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)

Whoever ridicules any part of the religion of the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), or its promises of reward or warnings of punishment, is a disbeliever. The evidence for that is the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“…Say: ‘Was it at Allah and His Ayat (proofs, evidence, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) and His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that you were mocking?’

Make no excuse; you have disbelieved after you had believed”.

Quran [at-Tawbah 9:65-66].

Shaykh ‘Abd Ar-Rahmaan as-Sa‘di (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The foundation of Islam is built on veneration of Allah and respect for His religion and His Messengers, and any mockery thereof is contrary to this principle and is in sharp contrast to it.

End quote from Tayseer al-Kareem ar-Rahmaan (p. 342)

Shaykh Ibn Baaz (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

All the scholars are unanimously agreed that if the Muslim reviles or criticises the religion or reviles or criticises the Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), or ridicules him, then he is an apostate and a disbeliever, who may be executed, and his wealth seized.

End quote from Fatāwá Noor ‘ala ad-Darb (1/139)

7. Sehr (magic or witchcraft)

Whoever does that or approves of it is a disbeliever. The evidence for that is the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“neither of these two (angels) taught anyone (such things) till they had said, ‘We are only for trial, so disbelieve not (by learning this magic from us)’”

Quran [al-Baqarah 2:102].

Regarding this nullifier of Islam, there is no scholarly consensus on all forms of it.

So, if the practitioner of witchcraft does something that constitutes kufr (disbelief), such as disrespectfully handling a copy of the Qur’an, or prostrating to the devils, and the like, then he is a disbeliever according to scholarly consensus.

But if he does not do any such things, then most of the scholars are of the view that he is also a disbeliever just because of his practicing magic or witchcraft.

8. Supporting the Mushrikin=disblievers and helping them against the Muslims.

The evidence for that is the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And if any amongst you takes them as Auliya (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allah guides not those people who are the Zalimoon (polytheists and wrongdoers and unjust).”

Quran [al-Maa’idah 5:51].

What is meant by that is if a Muslim helps, supports, and aids the disbelievers against the Muslims, and he forms an alliance with their party, instead of the party of the believers.

In his commentary on the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning), “Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliya (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allah in any way” [Aal ‘Imran 3:28], At-Tabari (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

Do not, O believers, take the disbelievers as a source of help and support or ally yourself with them in support of their religion, supporting them against the Muslims instead of the believers, and telling them about the Muslims’ weak points, for whoever does that “will never be helped by Allah in any way”.

What is meant is that he has disavowed Allah and Allah has disavowed him because of his apostasy from His religion and his becoming a disbeliever. “except if you indeed fear a danger from them” Quran [Aal ‘Imran 3:28], that is, unless you are under their rule and you fear that they may kill you, so you pay lip service to giving them support, whilst concealing enmity towards them in your hearts, and you do not support them in what they are following of disbelief or help them against any Muslim in any way.

End quote from Tafseer at-Tabari (3/140)

The scholars of Morocco issued a fatwa stating that Muhammad ibn ‘Abdullah as-Sa‘di, one of the kings of Marrakesh, became a disbeliever when he sought the help of the King of Portugal against his paternal uncle.

See: al-Istiqsaa’ li Akhbaar Duwal al-Maghrib al-Aqsa (2/70)

In al-Qada’ min Nawaazil al-Imam al-Burzuli (may Allah have mercy on him) it says that the ruler of the Muslims, Yoosuf ibn Taashfeen al-Lamtooni (may Allah have mercy on him) asked the scholars of his time (may Allah be pleased with them) about Ibn ‘Abbaad al-Andalusi writing to the Franks (i.e., Christians) asking for help against the Muslims. Most of them (may Allah be pleased with them) replied that he was an apostate and a disbeliever.

See: al-Istiqsaa li Akhbaar Duwal al-Maghrib al-Aqsa (5/75)

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on) issued a fatwa concerning those who joined the Tatars and fought the Muslims, stating that such a person was an apostate, and he said:

If the Sahabah=Companions of Prophet Muhammed called those who withheld zakat apostates – even though they fasted and prayed, and did not fight the main body of the Muslims – then how about those who have joined the enemies of Allah and His Messenger to fight the Muslims?

End quote from Majmoo‘ Fatāwá Shaykh al-Islam (28/530-531)

9. Believing that it is permissible for some people to go beyond the bounds of Shari’ah=Islamic laws (and follow a religion other than Islam)

Whoever believes that it is permissible for some people to go beyond the bounds of the Shari’ah of Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) (and follow a religion other than Islam) is a disbeliever, because Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter, he will be one of the losers.”

Quran [Aal ‘Imran 3:85].

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

It is well known in Islam, and all the Muslims are unanimously agreed, that whoever thinks that any religion other than Islam is valid, or that following a set of laws other than the laws of Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is acceptable, is a disbeliever. This is like the disbelief of one who believes in part of the Qur’an and disbelieves in part of the Qur’an.

End quote from al-Fatāwá al-Kubra (3/543)

10. Turning away from the religion of Allah, and not learning it or acting in accordance with it

The evidence for that is the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And who does more wrong than he who is reminded of the Ayat (proofs, evidence, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of his Lord, then he turns aside therefrom? Verily, we shall exact retribution from the Mujrimoon (criminals, disbelievers, polytheists, sinners, etc.)”

Quran [as-Sajdah 32:22].

What is meant by the “disbelief of turning away” is turning away from that which the Messenger brought, not paying any attention to it, not learning it from him, and not paying it any heed.

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

With regard to the “disbelief of turning away”, it means turning away from the Messenger and ignoring him, neither believing him nor disbelieving him, neither taking him as an ally nor taking him as an enemy, and not paying any attention to what he brought at all.

End quote from Madaarij as-Saalikeen (1/347)

Shaykh ‘Abd al-Lateef ibn ‘Abd Ar-Rahmaan ibn Hasan Aal ash-Shaykh (may Allah have mercy on him) said, in a detailed response concerning that:

People’s conditions vary greatly, and they vary according to their level of faith. This applies if faith is present in the first place, but negligence has to do with things that are less important than faith, such as some deeds that are obligatory or mustahab=recommended.

But if there is no faith at all – meaning a kind of faith by which a person is regarded as a Muslim – and he turns away from it altogether, then this is the “disbelief of turning away”, concerning which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And surely, we have created many of the jinns and mankind for Hell. They have hearts wherewith they understand not, they have eyes wherewith they see not, and they have ears wherewith they hear not (the truth). They are like cattle, nay even more astray; those! They are the heedless ones.”

Quran [al-A’raf 9:179]

“But whosoever turns away from My Reminder (i.e., neither believes in this Quran nor acts on its orders, etc.) verily, for him is a life of hardship, and We shall raise him up blind on the Day of Resurrection”

[Taha Qur’an 20:124].

But you should understand that what matters is knowing the reality of faith, even if the expressions and wording vary.

End quote.

For more reading, please Google the Ten Nullifiers of Islam) by Imām Muḥammad b. ‘Abd al-Wahāb may Allāh bestow His mercy upon him

We have not come across anyone who said that there was scholarly consensus concerning this type of disbelief.

𝐀 𝐊𝐚𝐟𝐢𝐫=𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐚 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 𝐒𝐚𝐭𝐚𝐧=𝐈𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐠𝐨𝐨𝐝

A Gift to the Sunnī in Demolishing the Creed of the Shīah Sh. Alee Al-Haddaadee

The Reality of Shi’ism – Sh. Muhibbudeen al-Khateeb

The Rejectionist Shi’a – Dr Saleh as Saleh [Audio Series|En]

The Status of the Twelvers Shi’a Imams= Ithna ‘Ashari Shi’a

Distortion of the Qur’ân by the Shi’a Raafidis

Anyone Consider non-Prophets superior to Prophets peace be upon them is NOT Muslim- Shi’a as an Example

The hadeeth “There will appear among you twelve imams coming one after another, all of them from Quraysh.”

Why aren’t there any mediators between God and his slaves in Islam?

Sending blessings upon the Prophet and his Companions

Al-Nawawi on supplications for Prophet Muhammed

Ruling on building mosques over graves

Prohibition of grave worship in Islam

Permissible and prohibited Tawassul=Supplication in Islam- Protect your faith from shirk (Polytheism)

‘Umar ibn Al-Khattab did not seek the help of Allah by virtue of the status of al-‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him)

Right from Almighty Allah and wrong from me and Satan

Prepared by Mohamad Mostafa Nassar-

www.IslamCompass.com

Make sure to copy and email this post for your reference, you might need it later.

Arrogance is not only a sign of insecurity, but also a sign of immaturity. Mature and fully realised persons can get their points across, even emphatically without demeaning or intimidating others.