There is difference of opinion within the Christian scholarship as to which John wrote the gospel and which John wrote the epistles and which John wrote the book of revelation, is it the disciple John or someone else.
To proof that this gospel is corrupted and even not written By John you need to quote this verse:
“Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were uneducated and untrained men, they marveled. And they realized that they had been with Jesus”. Acts 4:13
This argument is enough to win the debate, it clearly says John was uneducated then how can he write the GOSPEL that too in GREEK in high vocabulary and semantics.
Gospel According to John, fourth of the four New Testament narratives recounting the life and lie of the death of Jesus Christ. John’s is the only one of the four not considered among the Synoptic Gospels (i.e., those presenting a common view).
Although the Gospel appears not to be written by St. John the Apostle, who is claimed “the beloved disciple” of Jesus, there has been considerable discussion of the actual identity of the author.
The language of the Gospel and its well-developed theology suggest that the author may have lived later than John and based his writing on John’s teachings and testimonies.
Moreover, the facts that several episodes in the life of Jesus are recounted out of sequence with the Synoptics and that the final chapter appears to be a later addition suggest that the text may be a composite.
The Gospel’s place and date of composition are also uncertain; many scholars suggest that it was written at Ephesus, in Asia Minor, about 100 CE for the purpose of communicating the truths about Christ to Christians of Hellenistic background.
Allah knows Best.
—
Almighty Allah is the highest and most knowledgeable, and the attribution of knowledge to him is the safest.
Right from Almighty Allah and wrong from me and Satan
Prepared by Mohamad Mostafa Nassar- Australia.
Make sure to copy and email this post for your reference, you might need it later.
Arrogance is not only a sign of insecurity, but also a sign of immaturity. Mature and fully realised persons can get their points across, even emphatically without demeaning or intimidating others.