Everyone knows that ants communicate by chemicals detected by scent and never sound! Is this not a scientific error in the Qur’an?
This style of argument is quite sophomoric in that it is entirely based on someone who does not even have a rudimentary level understanding of zoology or entomology (I believe this is covered in 9th-Grade Biology in the USA). Its sadly typical of this genre of anti-Islamic quasi-polemicists.
You seriously could not go to the library or even do a web search for information on acoustic communication by ants? What does this say about your credibility as a genre collectively?
The critic fallaciously relied upon an English translation of the Qur’an which no Muslim relies upon. Unlike the Christians’ New Testament which has no Syriac or Aramaic original, nor even a Greek codex from the 1st century CE, the Qur’an has always been in Arabic as it is today, and this is the standard throughout the world.
Critics and supporters alike agree that the Qur’an was always Arabic (ignoring any neophytes who baselessly claim it was Syriac). Even orientalists with half a brain quote from the Arabic text.
Firstly, have you ever heard of something called a “miracle” associated with something called a “prophet”? If Moses parted the Red Sea, Solomon hearing the communication of ants is nothing.
So, the question is: Do ants communicate acoustically?
Here is the verse:
“Till, when they came up to the Valley of Ants, an ant said, “O you ants, enter your dwellings so that Sulayman and his hosts would not definitely crush you, (while) they are not aware.” Surah Al-Naml= Chapter the ants (27:18)
(18) Until when they reached a valley of naml=ants? one of the namla (one ant) t(un) conveyed: O you company of naml? into your dwellings lest Solomon and his armies crush you unbeknownst to them. (19) So, he smiled, amused by her message, and said: O my Lord!
Order me that I may be grateful for Your favours which you have bestowed on me and on my parents, and that I may work righteousness that will please You. And admit me, by Your Grace, to the ranks of Your righteous servants.”
First, we have the word “naml” in Arabic which is a word for ants as well as termites in the Arabic language. Ants are usually called in Arabic “an-Naml al-Abyad” meaning “the white ant”.
The antagonist(s) typically make the fallacious assumption that ants do not communicate by sound.
Not only do ants communicate by sound, but termites are specifically known to communicate by sound.
Regarding ants, their acoustic communication has been thoroughly researched and documented in a study from Robert Hickling, National Center for Physical Acoustics University of Mississippi and Richard L. Brown, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University entitled “Nearfield acoustic communication by ants”. Make sure to do some research on Google and read about this research and about:
Stridulation Sounds of Black Fire Ants (Solenopsis richteri) in Different Situations
Not only did they document ant sounds – and here is the devastating blow to this missionary nonsense – there are some Scientific YouTube channels recorded the sounds you can hear on the following URL from Gross Science Channel:
Read more about Ants social and communication interactions.
Now that absolutely ends the argument right there. But to take it even a step further, scholars of Qur’an hermeneutics have stated that due to the verses preceding 18-19 it can be strongly adduced that these are winged ants or possible winged termites.
In verse 27:16 which is 2 verses before the topic of this discussion, Solomon states: “`ullimna mantiqa- altayr?
” meaning, “we have been taught the mode of communication for those things which fly (birds, etc)”. The word “tayr” literally means to fly as the words for “bird” and “airplane” also derive from the same root of “tayr” in the Arabic language.
This is the opinion of ash-Shu`bi’s related in al-Qurtubi tafsir vol. 13 who states: “These ‘namlah’ had two wings, thus they were categorized as tayr…” I use the word “naml” instead of “ant” and “things that fly” instead of “bird”, since the English translations have failed to capture these linguistic nuances which must be explained.
It is well known that termites communicate by sound and this does not require any posting of a research paper. Even the Orkin pest control guy knows that they do.
What is interesting to note is that wings in ants is a sign of unmated males and females, as they are called “winged reproductive” or “swarmer”. This is because they leave their mounds en masse to mate. Hence, the verse mentions that these ants are not in their mounds but out in the open. This verse uses the feminine verb “qalat” regarding the ant that warned the others. Thus, it was perhaps a winged, unmated queen.
Now do critics of a Judeo-Christian background have anything to stand upon when they make this criticism.
No. The word used in verses 18-19 for communication are inflections of the word “Qur’an; This word does not only mean to speak, but also to convey something or to make sound. The cognate for this word in previous scriptures is also “Qur’an; in Aramaic and is found in the Book of Daniel in the following manner:
“I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake…” (Daniel 7:11)
A talking horn?
The notion of an inanimate horn talking is even more absurd than an ant talking! You will often find that the Christian missionaries like to cast stones from glass houses.
The fact is that these are miracles, and you are not supposed to try and “scientifically explain” them anyways. However, even when we answer the missionaries’ challenges by doing so, they end up falling flat on their faces.
How does the Qur’an document such detail which would have literally been unknowable in the 7th century C.E.?
According to those who say the Prophet Muhammad (P) invented the Qur’an one would have to conclude that he was a Biblical Scholar, a Semitic Etymologist with prowess in Hebrew, Syriac and Greek on a scholarly level, an OB-Gyn, a
Chemist, a Meteorologist, a Geologist, a Zoologist, a Chemist, etc., and now an Entomologist! Maybe he had a time machine, eh? Dismissing the Qur’an as the Prophet’s (P) invention creates more problems than it addresses.
Allah knows best.–
Almighty Allah is the highest and most knowledgeable, and the attribution of knowledge to him is the safest.
Right from Almighty Allah and wrong from me and Satan
Prepared by Mohamad Mostafa Nassar- Australia.
Make sure to copy and email this post for your reference, you might need it later.
Arrogance is not only a sign of insecurity, but also a sign of immaturity. Mature and fully realised persons can get their points across, even emphatically without demeaning or intimidating others.