Listen to this

𝐀 𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐟𝐢-𝐀𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐢 𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐋𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐚𝐡𝐢𝐡 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝟏𝟎𝟓𝟎: 𝐀𝐛𝐮 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐚 𝐚𝐥-𝐀𝐬𝐡‘𝐚𝐫𝐢’𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭, 𝐀𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐑𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐭𝐡𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐂𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐱

Mohamad Mostafa Nassar
Twitter:@NassarMohamadMR

𝐎𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

𝐀 𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐟𝐢-𝐀𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐢 𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐋𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐚𝐡𝐢𝐡 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝟏𝟎𝟓𝟎 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐧 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐛𝐮 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐚 𝐚𝐥-𝐀𝐬𝐡‘𝐚𝐫𝐢 𝐢𝐧 𝐒𝐚𝐡𝐢𝐡 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝟏𝟎𝟓𝟎. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐨𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧, 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐭, 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝, 𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐭𝐡𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐜𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐱. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐚 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞-𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐫, 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐬, 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐛𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐬 𝐛𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐢 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤. 𝐈𝐭 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐜, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐝. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐀𝐛𝐮 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐢 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐦, 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬, 𝐚𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧’𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧.

𝐀 𝐦𝐚𝐣𝐨𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 “𝐧𝐚𝐬𝐤𝐡 𝐚𝐥-𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐡”. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐮𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐭’𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡, 𝐧𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧. 𝐑𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰, 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐧.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐭𝐡𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐜𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐱 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞. 𝐈𝐭 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐛𝐮 𝐁𝐚𝐤𝐫’𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐔𝐭𝐡𝐦𝐚𝐧’𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞. 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐭 𝐌𝐮𝐡𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐚𝐝, 𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐡 𝐛𝐞 𝐮𝐩𝐨𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐦 “𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐡𝐮 𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐡𝐢 𝐰𝐚 𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐦”. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐭 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐚𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐞, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐫 𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐣𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐛𝐲 𝐨𝐧𝐞. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐝𝐞 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥, 𝐭𝐰𝐨 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐡𝐬, 𝐚 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐥-𝐓𝐚𝐰𝐛𝐚𝐡, 𝐚 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧 𝟔𝟏:𝟐, 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐡, 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐬 𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 𝐄𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 𝐢𝐬 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐥𝐲.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 “𝐀𝐡𝐥𝐮𝐬 𝐒𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐚𝐡 𝐰𝐚𝐥 𝐉𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐚𝐡”, 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐞𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐬 “𝐀𝐬-𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐟 𝐀𝐬-𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐡”. 𝐈𝐭 𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐩𝐭𝐬 𝐚 𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐟𝐢-𝐀𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐢 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐢 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬, 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬, 𝐭𝐚𝐟𝐬𝐢𝐫, 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬, 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐭 𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩.

𝐎𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐥, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐒𝐚𝐡𝐢𝐡 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝟏𝟎𝟓𝟎 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 𝐑𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫, 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐲, 𝐢𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐦𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐢 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐚𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐞𝐜𝐡, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐱 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐐𝐮𝐫’𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐏𝐃𝐅 𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞. 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐰𝐡𝐨𝐦 𝐢𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐧.

𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐀𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐡 𝐊𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭.

𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬:

Proof of The Preservation of the Quran

Understanding Differences in Qirāʾāt (Recitations) of the Glorious Holy Quran

Did Devotees (Ribbīyūn) fight with him, or were Devotees (Ribbīyūn) killed with him? Quran (3:146)

Global Acknowledgment: Non-Muslim Scholars’ Confirmation of Quran and Hadith Preservation

Refuting the 26 Qur’ans Lie

Shredding the Gospels: Contradictions, Errors, Mistakes, Fictions

Seven Ahruf Scheme and the Centrality of the Prophetic Precedent

The revelation of the Qur’an in seven styles (ahruf, sing. harf)

How do we know that Qur’an has not been changed?

Quran Preservation & Compilation -1 (Prophet’s lifetime)

Quran Preservation & Compilation -2 (Circumstances during Abu Bakr’s time)

Quran Preservation & Compilation -3 (under Abu Bakr)

Quran Preservation & Compilation -4 (under ‘Uthman)

The Revelation and Compilation of Quran – History Covered

101 Proofs that the Quran is Not Copied from the Bible

6 Reasons Qur’an Cannot Be a Copy of Bible

Paul the False Apostle of Satan

Atheism

The Orientalists, The Bible & The Qur’ân: A Brief Review of The Bible Borrowing Theories

The Collection, Arrangement, and the Preservation of the Glorious Quran

What contradictions exist within the Quran? Contradictions in the Quran?

The Collection, Arrangement, and the Preservation of the Glorious Quran

False Accusations Against Uthman Ibn Affan

There is only ONE Qur’an

Was the Originally Compiled Qur’an During the Era of Abu Bakr Incomplete?

Hadith Preservation Response

Why Didn’t God Preserve The Previous Books?

Answering Missionary Allegations Against the Noble Qur’an’s Preservation

Why Didn’t God Preserve The Previous Books?

Was the Originally Compiled Qur’an During the Era of Abu Bakr Incomplete?

What contradictions exist within the Quran? Contradictions in the Quran?

refuted the borrowing theories of the Qur’ân

 Context & Internal Relationships

Refutation Of The Internal Contradictions In The Qur’ân

The Defense of The Qur’ân Against The Bible Borrowing Theory

The Revelation and Compilation of Quran – History Covered