What does “Jesus is the heir” really mean? Does it mean he is the heir of GOD Almighty, or is this just another trinitarian lie?

The sections of this article are:

1- Does the Bible really say Jesus is the heir of GOD Almighty? 

      –  The Bible is clear about Jesus inheriting only his mansion in Heaven and earth here to defeat evil.
      – Only a blasphemous fool would claim that the verses meant to inherit all of what belongs to GOD Almighty!

2- Jesus’ mansion and its 12 thrones 
3- The author Hebrews was not even known!
4- Conclusion.

Let us look at the following verses from the Bible:

Genesis 15:4
Then the word of the LORD came to him: “This man will not be your heir, but a son coming from your own body will be your heir.

2 Samuel 14:7
Now the whole clan has risen up against your servant; they say, ‘Hand over the one who struck his brother down, so that we may put him to death for the life of his brother whom he killed; then we will get rid of the heir as well.‘ They would put out the only burning coal I have left, leaving my husband neither name nor descendant on the face of the earth.”

Jeremiah 49:1
[ A Message About Ammon] Concerning the Ammonites: This is what the LORD says: “Has Israel no sons? Has she no heirs? Why then has Molech taken possession of Gad? Why do his people live in its towns?

So according to the Old Testament, the heir must be one from a blood relationship such as a son, brother, daughter, etc…  Very good.  Let us now look at the New Testament.

Jesus’ inherits earth:

Matthew 21:38
“But when the tenants saw the son, they said to each other, ‘This is the heir. Come, let us kill him and take his inheritance.

Mark 12:7
“But the tenants said to one another, ‘This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.

Luke 20:14
“But when the tenants saw him, they talked the matter over. ‘This is the heir,’ they said. ‘Let us kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.

Acts 3:25
And you are heirs of the prophets and of the covenant God made with your fathers. He said to Abraham, ‘Through your offspring all peoples on earth will be blessed.’

Romans 4:13

It was not through law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith.

Romans 4:14

For if those who live by law are heirs, faith has no value and the promise is worthless,

Romans 8:17

Now if we are children, then we are heirs—heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory.

Galatians 3:29
If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Galatians 4:7
So you are no longer a slave, but a son; and since you are a son, God has made you also an heir.

Ephesians 3:6
This mystery is that through the gospel the Gentiles are heirs together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together in the promise in Christ Jesus.

Hebrews 1:2 (this was Shamoun’s verse in the debate)
but in these last days he has spoken to us by his son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Noah’s inheritance:

Hebrews 11:7
By faith Noah, when warned about things not yet seen, in holy fear built an ark to save his family. By his faith he condemned the world and became heir of the righteousness that comes by faith.

Hebrews 11:9
By faith he made his home in the promised land like a stranger in a foreign country; he lived in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob, who were heirs with him of the same promise.

Here as anyone with the least amount of brain can clearly see, Jesus, the heir, was not the heir of GOD Almighty’s Possessions, entire Universe, and everything that GOD Almighty Created.  He was given the inheritance of earth:

“Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.  In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, the LORD our Righteousness.  (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 23:5-6)”

Only a blasphemous fool would claim that they meant 
to inherit all of what belongs to GOD Almighty!

2- Jesus’ mansion and its 12 thrones:

Doubting Thomas could not raise Jesus??  No way!!

Also, 1 John 2:22 church-written lie is discussed further down in details in this table.  Ironically, the Bible’s own theologians admit that 1 John contains forgeries by church fathers.

Thomas raised many people from the dead (Matthew 10:7-8).  Yet, he and the disciples could not raise Jesus back to life after the crucifixion?  Not only that, but they all fled, and Thomas became the “doubting Thomas” because he did not believe that the man who returned was Jesus.  

But did you not raise people from the dead already, Thomas?  What happened there?  You could have raised Jesus himself back to life with your own hands!  Yet, it was impossible for you to believe that it was Jesus who returned?  Why?

These alleged miracles are very loud!  If you raise people from the dead, then the entire land of Palestine would have heard about it.  Yet, nothing recorded historically about them.  So do we have here loud miracles or loud lies?
Doubting Thomas also said “My Lord and my God” to Jesus.  Yet, all believers were called “God”, and Moses was the “God” of the Believers, Aaron and Pharaoh:

·       Moses was called “The God” (Exodus 7:1) of the Believers, Aaron and Pharaoh.  Jesus said he was greater than Moses.  Thomas, the Disciple, called Jesus “My Lord and my God” (John 20:28).  Jesus denied to be GOD Almighty.  All Believers were called “GODS and Sons of GOD” (Psalm 82:6) in the Bible.  “GOD” in the Bible also means master, leader, priest. 

Therefore, doubting Thomas’ statement did not suggest that Jesus was his Creator.  And Jesus being a “God” does not mean that he is GOD Almighty.  He is just another mere “God” like the rest of the believing creations and nothing more.

·       Except GOD Alone!  Jesus rejectedγαθόν.  Jesus forbade anyone from calling him γαθόν.  He said it is only for the Supreme GOD Almighty.

·       Jesus’ rule is only limited to his mansion.  Jesus also said that this Mansion is ruled by twelve Thrones (also called them 12 Fruits).  King of kings for Jesus does not refer to the corrupt earthly kings and thieves.  They were offered to Jesus before during his temptation by Satan, and Jesus ultimately refused them all.  Jesus is the king of the twelve thrones inside his mansion.  Other people in the OT were called King of kings also.  So, the title is not even unique to Jesus.

·       Contradictions in Jesus’ miracle-less miracles.  Mustard seed of faith and Great Faith both still failed:

King Melchizedek:

·       The Bible also says that Jesus had to be “in according to Melchizedek”.  And who is Melchizedek?  According to the Bible, he was the Jews’ highest priest who had “no father and no mother”, and “no beginning and no end” (Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5:6-10, Hebrews 7:1-20).

·       Jesus had to be similar and inline with him; another proof that Jesus being “God” doesn’t mean he is the Creator of the Universe.

·       Also, Jesus said Prophets are Servants, Jesus is the Son.  Son here means he is the Messiah.  The Old Testament thoroughly calls Jesus the slave of GOD [1] and who also fears GOD.  Yes indeed, the Islamic Isa (eesa) is the Messiah.  This is his special sonship.  He is also the Lord of his Mansion, which has twelve thrones or fruits [2].  

He is more than a mere Jewish Rasul (Prophet) in this regard.  That’s the limit of his sonship.  Otherwise, it is sun chips!  There is nothing GODly about him.  He is not our Creator.  With all of his glory and might, he still remains a mere abd (slave) of GOD [1] as all sons of GOD were also called slaves of GOD.  See also:

·       Sons of GOD in the Glorious Quran.  They are “….no more than servants raised to honor.  (The Noble Quran, 21:26).

·       Oxymoron Trinity.

Again, could “Jesus” and the disciples honestly even resurrect or create a fly on their own?  This is one of the Glorious Quran’s challenges to the polytheists from mankind who insist on deifying flesh and blood, dust and water, and idols.  All are helpless.  All are worthless when compared to Allah Almighty.
Sun Chips oxymoron:  The polytheist trinitarian pagans’ oxymoron here is that they are making a sun chips out of Islam’s Prophet-Isa’s sacred Messiahship and special sonship (“no more than servants raised to honour”) with their blasphemies of inflating him with hot air and making him the Creator of the Universe.

·       Jesus denied knowing when Judgment Day will come, and said I DON’T KNOW, ONLY GOD ALONE KNOWS!

·       1 John 2:22-23 [1] church-written lies are discussed further down in detail in this table.  Ironically, the Bible’s own theologians admit that 1 John contains forgeries by church fathers.

Adam is greater than Jesus:

Jesus forbade people from calling him “son of David ” and “son of Abraham ” (Muslims bless Abraham everyday.  Shedding light on Genesis 12:1-3 “I will bless those who bless you…”).  He said he is greater than them, and no one should call him son of any of these two servants of GOD Almighty.  Yet, Jesus walked around and called himself son of Adam countless times:

·       Is Jesus greater than Adam?  NT says no.

3- The author Hebrews was not even known!

The Book of Hebrews:

“The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he was obviously well known to the original recipients.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 1856)”

So, because the guy was supposedly “well known (which we don’t really know that for sure anyway)”, then would that give us the right to consider his words as the Words of GOD Almighty?!  I am sorry, but I do not really see the logic behind this!  The Book of Hebrews is one of the highly used Books among Christians.  I hear references from it a lot when listening to Christians preaching.   Yet, no one really knows who wrote it!  

This is quite ironic, because Christians use such highly doubtful books in their teachings as if they were the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.  I do not care what you call this, but I call it blasphemy, because it is the most ridiculous insult to GOD Almighty and His Holy Words that I have ever seen.

The Roman Catholic Encyclopedia admits that the Bible had been “altered”:

The subject of Mankind’s Corruption of the Bible has interested me greatly, and I have taken a closer look at this subject. It seems it is not only your site that brings this subject up, but a couple of Christian sites too.

For example, an article in the Catholic Encyclopedia that you mentioned in regard to the ‘Theophilus’ mentioned in Luke’s Gospel (from your Just Who Are The Real Authors Of The Bible? article) testifies to this fact (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14530a.htm):


No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author– all have been in some way altered. The material conditions under which a book was spread before the invention of printing (1440), the little care of the copyists, correctors, and glossators for the text, so different from the desire of accuracy exhibited to-day, explain sufficiently the divergences we find between various manuscripts of the same work.

To these causes may be added, in regard to the Scriptures, exegetical difficulties and dogmatical controversies. To exempt the sacred writings from ordinary conditions a very special providence would have been necessary, and it has not been the will of God to exercise this providence.”

Let us just go through that again – “No book of ancient times has come down to us exactly as it left the hands of its author–all have been in some way altered.”  All have been in some way altered! In view of this blatant admission, how can anyone expect me, or any Muslim, to follow an impure book?

When you compare this to the great lengths taken to preserve the original Qur’an, there is no contest! 

Luke 1:3

Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus,

The following is from the Catholic Encyclopedia:



If Theophilus existed in either the 2nd or the 4th centuries, then how could the writer of this gospel be the same Luke who is supposed to be with Jesus in the 1st century.

Did he live for 200 years?

Contradictions in historical claims and accounts of the Bible

Consider the following few examples that consist of historical contradictions in the Bible:

2 Samuel 10:18 talks about David slew the men of 700 chariots of the Syrians and 40,000 horsemen and Shobach the commander.
I Chronicles 19:18 says that David slew the men of 7000 chariots and 40,000 footmen.

2 Chronicles 9:25 says that Solomon had 4000 stalls for horses and chariots.
I Kings 4:26 says that he had 40,000 stalls for horses.

Ezra 2:5 talks about an exile Arah having 775 sons.
Nehemiah 7:10 talks about the same exile Arah having 652 sons.

2 Samuel 24:13 So God came to David, and told him, and said unto him, shall SEVEN YEARS OF FAMINE come unto thee in thy land? or will thou flee three months before thine enemies, while they pursue. thee?
I Chronicles 21:11 SO God came to David, and said unto him, thus saith the LORD, Choose thee. Either THREE YEARS OF FAMINE or three months to be destroyed before thy foes, while that the sword of thine enemies overtaketh thee.

How did Judas die?

“And he cast down the pieces of silver into the temple and departed and went out and hanged himself.” (Matthew 27:5)
“And falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all of his bowels gushed out.” (Acts 1:18)

2 Samuel 6:23 Therefore MICHAL the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death.
2 Samuel 21:8 But the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bare unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of MICHAL the daughter of Saul, whom she brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite.

2 Kings 24:8 Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. And his mother’s name was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem.
2 Chronicles 36:9 Jehoiachin was eight years old when he began to reign, and he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem: and he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD.

26th year of the reign of Asa I Kings 16:6-8
36th year of the reign of Asa I 2 Chronicles 16:1

How old was Ahaziah when he began to reign?

22 in 2 Kings 8:26
42 in 2 Chronicle 22:2

Who was Josiah’s successor?

Jehoahaz – 2 Chronicle 36:1
Shallum – Jeremiah 22:11

Also, your original scriptures are all doubtful according to the Bible’s own theologians and historians.  It is quite hilarious that even the Bible itself admits that it has been tampered with and corrupted by man’s garbage:

“How can you say, “We [the Jews] are wise, for we have the law of the LORD,” when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?’ (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)”

The Revised Standard Version makes it even clearer: “How can you say, ‘We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us’? But behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie.  (From the RSV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)”

And regarding who wrote the books and gospels of the Bible, as I quoted above, here is a sample of what the NIV Bible’s theologians and historians wrote:

Serious doubts exist as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark.  They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark.  His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost.  (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes, page 1528)”

“Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 1643)”

The writer of this letter does not identify himself, but he was obviously well known to the original recipients.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 1856)”

“The letter is difficult to date with precision….(From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 1905)”

“It seems safe to conclude that the book, at least in its early form, dates from the beginning of the monarchy. Some think that Samuel may have had a hand in shaping or compiling the materials of the book, but in fact we are unsure who the final author or editor was.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 286)”

“Although, according to tradition, Samuel wrote the book, authorship is actually uncertain.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 322)”

“The date of the composition is also unknown, but it was undoubtedly during the monarchy.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 322)”

The author is unknown. Jewish tradition points to Samuel, but it is unlikely that he is the author because the mention of David (4:17,22) implies a later date.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 360)”

Who the author was cannot be known with certainty since the book itself gives no indication of his identity.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 368)”

“There is little conclusive evidence as to the identity of the author of 1,2 Kings.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 459)”

Whoever the author was, it is clear that he was familiar with the book of Deuteronomy.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 459)”

“According to ancient Jewish tradition, Ezra wrote Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah (see Introduction to Ezra: Literary Form and Authorship), but this cannot be established with certainty.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 569)”

Although we do not know who wrote the book of Esther, from internal evidence it is possible to make some inferences about the author and the date of composition.  (From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 707)”

The unknown author probably had access to oral and/or written sources….(From the NIV Bible commentary, page 722)”

Regarding authorship, opinions are even more divided….(From the NIV Bible Commentary, page 773)”


4- Conclusion:

Enemies of Islam have been miserably defeated in the debates.  Their trinity is no more than one of history’s biggest lies that They were fooled into believing.  Their interpretation of Jesus being the “heir” was proven to be quite absurd and that it only demonstrated Their ignorance about the real meaning of the word throughout the New Testament.  Trinity is a lie and its polytheist trinitarian pagan and infidel-followers are no more than deceived fools who are destined to be doomed in Hell!

Also, the lies of crucifixion and resurrection were never even prophesied in the Old Testament.  On the contrary, the OT prophesied Islam’s claims and that is Jesus, the Messiah, will be saved from the crucifixion! 

Islam is the only Truth!  Islam is not a religion of confusion and man’s lies and alterations.  Islam is Allah Almighty’s Divine Truth that has proven Itself to be the Divine Truth from the Almighty Creator. 

Therefore, embrace Islam and you will be saved.  Otherwise, you will only have yourself to blame.

Allah knows Best.

Almighty Allah is the highest and most knowledgeable, and the attribution of knowledge to him is the safest.

Right from Almighty Allah and wrong from me and Satan

Prepared by Mohamad Mostafa Nassar- Australia.


Make sure to copy and email this post for your reference, you might need it later.

Arrogance is not only a sign of insecurity, but also a sign of immaturity. Mature and fully realised persons can get their points across, even emphatically without demeaning or intimidating others.